#289 closed task (released)
Double-check extensibility where sets of values are allowed
Reported by: | ibboard | Owned by: | ibboard |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | WarFoundry 0.1 |
Component: | WarFoundry-API | Version: | Unknown or N/A |
Keywords: | schema extensability | Cc: | |
Blocked By: | Blocking: |
Description
While looking at #279 I realised that the old schema isn't actually fully extensible because the schema requires one of the pre-defined limit elements, but we need to add an extra "composition" one. ArmourType may also need to be reworked for similar reasons.
Change History (6)
comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by
comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by
Owner: | set to ibboard |
---|---|
Status: | new → accepted |
comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by
comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by
comment:5 Changed 10 years ago by
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | accepted → closed |
Everything else seems sensible. There are no other choices and the only enumerations are ones that make boolean options a little nicer to read and explicit (e.g. "roundDirection" of up/down rather than "roundUp" as a boolean where false means down rather than not rounding).
comment:6 Changed 9 years ago by
Resolution: | fixed → released |
---|
Retro-actively tag RC1 releases as released
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
(In r582) Re #289: Double-check extensibility where sets of values are allowed