Mercurial > repos > IBBoard.WarFoundry.API.Tests

diff API/Objects/Requirement/RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirementTest.cs @ 207:27f163bf884a

Find changesets by keywords (author, files, the commit message), revision number or hash, or revset expression.
Re #379: Fix validation of requirements to check for unit * Update checked text to match new, cleaner text
author IBBoard <dev@ibboard.co.uk>
date Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:59:15 +0000
parents 49e50238c380
children
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/API/Objects/Requirement/RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirementTest.cs	Sun Jan 29 20:03:44 2012 +0000
+++ b/API/Objects/Requirement/RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirementTest.cs	Tue Jan 31 20:59:15 2012 +0000
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
 			RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1, unitType2);
 			Unit unit = CreateUnitOfType(unitType1, army);
 			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unit, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 "+unitType2.Name+" for every 1 "+unitType1.Name + " (would have 0 for 1)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 0 for 1)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType3);
 			Unit unit = CreateUnitOfType(unitType1, army);
 			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unit, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 0 for 1)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 0 for 1)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@
 			RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1, unitType2);
 			Unit unit = CreateUnitOfType(unitType1, army);
 			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unit, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 " + unitType2.Name + " for every 1 " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 1 for 2)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 1 for 2)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType3, 1, 1);
 			Unit unit = CreateUnitOfType(unitType1, army);
 			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unit, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 1 for 2)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 1 for 2)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType3, 1, 1);
 			Unit unit = CreateUnitOfType(unitType1, army);
 			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unit, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 " + unitType2.Name + " for every 1 " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 1 for 2); 1 " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 1 for 2)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 1 for 2); 1 × " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 1 for 2)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@
 			RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1, unitType2, unitType3);
 			Unit unit = CreateUnitOfType(unitType1, army);
 			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unit, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 " + unitType2.Name + " for every 1 " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 1 for 2); 1 " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 1 for 2)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 1 for 2); 1 × " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 1 for 2)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2, 1, 2);
 			Unit unit = CreateUnitOfType(unitType1, army);
 			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unit, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 " + unitType2.Name + " for every 2 " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 1 for 3)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every 2 × " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 1 for 3)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2, 2, 3);
 			Unit unit = CreateUnitOfType(unitType1, army);
 			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unit, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 2 " + unitType2.Name + " for every 3 " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 1 for 1)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 2 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every 3 × " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 1 for 1)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2, 2, 3);
 			Unit unit = CreateUnitOfType(unitType1, army);
 			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unit, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 2 " + unitType2.Name + " for every 3 " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 1 for 2)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 2 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every 3 × " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 1 for 2)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2, 2, 3);
 			Unit unit = CreateUnitOfType(unitType1, army);
 			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unit, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 2 " + unitType2.Name + " for every 3 " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 3 for 4)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 2 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every 3 × " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 3 for 4)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2, unitType3);
 			Unit unit = CreateUnitOfType(unitType1, army);
 			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unit, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 2 for 3)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 2 for 3)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2, unitType3);
 			Unit unit = CreateUnitOfType(unitType1, army);
 			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unit, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 2 for 3)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 2 for 3)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2, unitType3);
 			Unit unit = CreateUnitOfType(unitType1, army);
 			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unit, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 2 for 3)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 2 for 3)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(3, unitType2, unitType3);
 			Unit unit = CreateUnitOfType(unitType1, army);
 			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unit, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 3 " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 2 for 7)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 3 × " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 2 for 7)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(3, unitType2, unitType3);
 			Unit unit = CreateUnitOfType(unitType1, army);
 			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unit, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 3 " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 2 for 7)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 3 × " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 2 for 7)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(3, unitType2, unitType3);
 			Unit unit = CreateUnitOfType(unitType1, army);
 			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unit, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 3 " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 2 for 7)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unit.UnitType, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 3 × " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 2 for 7)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -464,7 +464,7 @@
 			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType1, army);
 			RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1, unitType2);
 			Assert.That(req.ValidatesArmy(army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 " + unitType2.Name + " for every 1 " + unitType1.Name + " (have 0 for 1)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 0 for 1)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType3);
 			Assert.That(req.ValidatesArmy(army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 " + unitType1.Name + " (have 0 for 1)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 0 for 1)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -489,7 +489,7 @@
 			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType1, army);
 			RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1, unitType2);
 			Assert.That(req.ValidatesArmy(army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 " + unitType2.Name + " for every 1 " + unitType1.Name + " (have 1 for 2)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 1 for 2)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -517,7 +517,7 @@
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2, 1, 2);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType3, 1, 1);
 			Assert.That(req.ValidatesArmy(army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 " + unitType1.Name + " (have 1 for 2)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 1 for 2)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -532,7 +532,7 @@
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2, 1, 1);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType3, 1, 1);
 			Assert.That(req.ValidatesArmy(army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 " + unitType2.Name + " for every 1 " + unitType1.Name + " (have 1 for 2); 1 " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 " + unitType1.Name + " (have 1 for 2)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 1 for 2); 1 × " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 1 for 2)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -545,7 +545,7 @@
 			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType1, army);
 			RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1, unitType2, unitType3);
 			Assert.That(req.ValidatesArmy(army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 " + unitType2.Name + " for every 1 " + unitType1.Name + " (have 1 for 2); 1 " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 " + unitType1.Name + " (have 1 for 2)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 1 for 2); 1 × " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 1 for 2)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@
 			RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2, 2, 3);
 			Assert.That(req.ValidatesArmy(army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 2 " + unitType2.Name + " for every 3 " + unitType1.Name + " (have 1 for 1)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 2 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every 3 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 1 for 1)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -569,7 +569,7 @@
 			RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2, 2, 3);
 			Assert.That(req.ValidatesArmy(army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 2 " + unitType2.Name + " for every 3 " + unitType1.Name + " (have 1 for 2)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 2 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every 3 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 1 for 2)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -581,7 +581,7 @@
 			RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2, 2, 3);
 			Assert.That(req.ValidatesArmy(army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 2 " + unitType2.Name + " for every 3 " + unitType1.Name + " (have 3 for 4)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 2 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every 3 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 3 for 4)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@
 			RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2, 1, 2);
 			Assert.That(req.ValidatesArmy(army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 " + unitType2.Name + " for every 2 " + unitType1.Name + " (have 1 for 3)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every 2 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 1 for 3)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -680,7 +680,7 @@
 			RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(3, unitType2, unitType3);
 			Assert.That(req.ValidatesArmy(army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 3 " + unitType1.Name + " (have 2 for 7)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 3 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 2 for 7)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -692,7 +692,7 @@
 			RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(3, unitType2, unitType3);
 			Assert.That(req.ValidatesArmy(army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 3 " + unitType1.Name + " (have 2 for 7)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 3 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 2 for 7)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
@@ -704,7 +704,7 @@
 			RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(3, unitType2, unitType3);
 			Assert.That(req.ValidatesArmy(army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
-			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 3 " + unitType1.Name + " (have 2 for 7)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 3 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 2 for 7)."));
 		}
 
 		private static void AddUnitsOfTypeToArmy(int count, UnitType unitType, Army army)
@@ -725,21 +725,21 @@
 			return new Unit(unitType, army.GetCategory(unitType.MainCategory));
 		}
 
-		public override RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement GetObject()
+		public override RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement GetObject()
 		{
 			RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType3);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType1, 2, 3);
 			return req;
 		}
 
-		public override RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement GetSameObject()
+		public override RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement GetSameObject()
 		{
 			RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType3);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType1, 2, 3);
 			return req;
 		}
 
-		public override RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement GetDifferentObject()
+		public override RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement GetDifferentObject()
 		{
 			RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new RequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType3);
 			DummyWarFoundryFactory factory = new DummyWarFoundryFactory();