Mercurial > repos > IBBoard.WarFoundry.API.Tests
diff API/Objects/Requirement/UnitRequiresAtLeastNUnitsRequirementTest.cs @ 205:d39682a98adf
Re #379: Fix validation of requirements to check for unit
* Add unit tests for army object
* Update tests that check the message
| author | IBBoard <dev@ibboard.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| date | Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:40:19 +0000 |
| parents | 8c519a44e699 |
| children | 27f163bf884a |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/API/Objects/Requirement/UnitRequiresAtLeastNUnitsRequirementTest.cs Sat Jan 28 16:58:42 2012 +0000 +++ b/API/Objects/Requirement/UnitRequiresAtLeastNUnitsRequirementTest.cs Sun Jan 29 19:40:19 2012 +0000 @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ Army army = new Army(mockRace, "Test", 1000); RequiresAtLeastNUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresAtLeastNUnitsRequirement(unitType1); req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2, 2); - Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unitType2, army), Is.EqualTo("Army contains " + unitType1.Name + " and so must contain: 2 × " + unitType2.Name + " (would have 1).")); + Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unitType2, army), Is.EqualTo("Army would contain " + unitType1.Name + " and so must contain: 2 × " + unitType2.Name + " (would have 1).")); } [Test] @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ RequiresAtLeastNUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresAtLeastNUnitsRequirement(unitType1); req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2); req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType3); - Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unitType2, army), Is.EqualTo("Army contains " + unitType1.Name + " and so must contain: 1 × " + unitType3.Name + " (would have 0).")); + Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unitType2, army), Is.EqualTo("Army would contain " + unitType1.Name + " and so must contain: 1 × " + unitType3.Name + " (would have 0).")); } [Test] @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ RequiresAtLeastNUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresAtLeastNUnitsRequirement(unitType1); req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2); req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType3); - Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unitType3, army), Is.EqualTo("Army contains " + unitType1.Name + " and so must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " (would have 0).")); + Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unitType3, army), Is.EqualTo("Army would contain " + unitType1.Name + " and so must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " (would have 0).")); } [Test] @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ RequiresAtLeastNUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresAtLeastNUnitsRequirement(unitType1); req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2); req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType3); - Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unitType2, army), Is.EqualTo("Army contains " + unitType1.Name + " and so must contain: 1 × " + unitType3.Name + " (would have 0).")); + Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unitType2, army), Is.EqualTo("Army would contain " + unitType1.Name + " and so must contain: 1 × " + unitType3.Name + " (would have 0).")); } [Test] @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ RequiresAtLeastNUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresAtLeastNUnitsRequirement(unitType1); req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2); req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType3); - Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unitType3, army), Is.EqualTo("Army contains " + unitType1.Name + " and so must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " (would have 0).")); + Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unitType3, army), Is.EqualTo("Army would contain " + unitType1.Name + " and so must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " (would have 0).")); } private static void AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(UnitType unitType, Army army)