Mercurial > repos > IBBoard.WarFoundry.API.Tests

changeset 220:0fa634c6391b

Find changesets by keywords (author, files, the commit message), revision number or hash, or revset expression.
Re #394: Make requirements (or factory) more closely match Rollcall methods * Add matching unit tests for validation
author IBBoard <dev@ibboard.co.uk>
date Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:32:47 +0000
parents f951595143a9
children c40cb2048fc3
files API/Objects/Requirement/UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirementTests.cs
diffstat 1 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) [+]
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/API/Objects/Requirement/UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirementTests.cs	Sat Mar 24 16:46:06 2012 +0000
+++ b/API/Objects/Requirement/UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirementTests.cs	Sat Mar 24 19:32:47 2012 +0000
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@
 		}
 
 		[Test]
-		public void TestRequirementWithOR()
+		public void TestAddingRequirementWithOR()
 		{
 			Army army = new Army(mockRace, "Test", 1000);
 			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@
 		}
 
 		[Test]
-		public void TestRequirementWithORWithOtherUnit()
+		public void TestAddingRequirementWithORWithOtherUnit()
 		{
 			Army army = new Army(mockRace, "Test", 1000);
 			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@
 		}
 
 		[Test]
-		public void TestRequirementWithORWithLimit()
+		public void TestAddingRequirementWithORWithLimit()
 		{
 			Army army = new Army(mockRace, "Test", 1000);
 			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@
 		}
 
 		[Test]
-		public void TestRequirementWithORWithLimitWithOtherUnit()
+		public void TestAddingRequirementWithORWithLimitWithOtherUnit()
 		{
 			Army army = new Army(mockRace, "Test", 1000);
 			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@
 		}
 
 		[Test]
-		public void TestRequirementWithORWithLimitWithBothUnits()
+		public void TestAddingRequirementWithORWithLimitWithBothUnits()
 		{
 			Army army = new Army(mockRace, "Test", 1000);
 			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@
 		}
 
 		[Test]
-		public void TestRequirementWithORBasedOnRollcall()
+		public void TestAddingRequirementWithORBasedOnRollcall()
 		{
 			Army army = new Army(mockRace, "Test", 1000);
 			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@
 		}
 
 		[Test]
-		public void TestRequirementWithoutORBasedOnRollcall()
+		public void TestAddingRequirementWithoutORBasedOnRollcall()
 		{
 			Army army = new Army(mockRace, "Test", 1000);
 			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
@@ -383,6 +383,101 @@
 			Assert_That__ValidationFails(req, army, "Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 1 for 2).");
 		}
 
+		[Test]
+		public void TestRequirementWithOR()
+		{
+			Army army = new Army(mockRace, "Test", 1000);
+			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
+			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2, unitType3);
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType1, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationFails(req, army, "Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 0 for 1).");
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType2, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationPasses(req, army);
+		}
+
+		[Test]
+		public void TestRequirementWithORWithOtherUnit()
+		{
+			Army army = new Army(mockRace, "Test", 1000);
+			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
+			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2, unitType3);
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType1, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationFails(req, army, "Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 0 for 1).");
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType2, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationPasses(req, army);
+		}
+
+		[Test]
+		public void TestRequirementWithORWithLimit()
+		{
+			Army army = new Army(mockRace, "Test", 1000);
+			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
+			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(2, 1, unitType2, unitType3);
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType1, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationFails(req, army, "Army must contain: 2 × " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 0 for 1).");
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType2, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationFails(req, army, "Army must contain: 2 × " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 1 for 1).");
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType2, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationPasses(req, army);
+		}
+
+		[Test]
+		public void TestRequirementWithORWithLimitWithOtherUnit()
+		{
+			Army army = new Army(mockRace, "Test", 1000);
+			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
+			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(2, 1, unitType2, unitType3);
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType1, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationFails(req, army, "Army must contain: 2 × " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 0 for 1).");
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType3, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationFails(req, army, "Army must contain: 2 × " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 1 for 1).");
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType3, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationPasses(req, army);
+		}
+
+		[Test]
+		public void TestRequirementWithORWithLimitWithBothUnits()
+		{
+			Army army = new Army(mockRace, "Test", 1000);
+			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
+			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(2, 1, unitType2, unitType3);
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType1, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationFails(req, army, "Army must contain: 2 × " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 0 for 1).");
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType2, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationFails(req, army, "Army must contain: 2 × " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 1 for 1).");
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType3, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationPasses(req, army);
+		}
+
+		[Test]
+		public void TestRequirementWithORBasedOnRollcall()
+		{
+			Army army = new Army(mockRace, "Test", 1000);
+			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
+			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(2, unitType2, unitType3);
+			AddUnitsOfTypeToArmy(3, unitType2, army);
+			AddUnitsOfTypeToArmy(2, unitType3, army);
+			AddUnitsOfTypeToArmy(10, unitType1, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationPasses(req, army);
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType1, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationFails(req, army, "Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 2 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 5 for 11).");
+		}
+
+		[Test]
+		public void TestRequirementWithoutORBasedOnRollcall()
+		{
+			Army army = new Army(mockRace, "Test", 1000);
+			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
+			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(2, unitType2);
+			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(2, unitType3);
+			AddUnitsOfTypeToArmy(3, unitType2, army);
+			AddUnitsOfTypeToArmy(2, unitType3, army);
+			AddUnitsOfTypeToArmy(4, unitType1, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationPasses(req, army);
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType1, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationFails(req, army, "Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType3.Name + " for every 2 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 2 for 5).");
+		}
+
 		protected override UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement CreateRequirement(UnitType requirementOn)
 		{
 			return new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(requirementOn);