Mercurial > repos > IBBoard.WarFoundry.API.Tests

changeset 222:12ac487af0ba

Find changesets by keywords (author, files, the commit message), revision number or hash, or revset expression.
Re #395: Requirements can incorrectly allow based on common divisor * Add tests to check for using common divisor (e.g. allowing 1 per 2 when we said allow 2 per 4)
author IBBoard <dev@ibboard.co.uk>
date Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:24:41 +0100
parents c40cb2048fc3
children fd51527f6d64
files API/Objects/Requirement/UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirementTests.cs
diffstat 1 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) [+]
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/API/Objects/Requirement/UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirementTests.cs	Sat Mar 24 20:34:42 2012 +0000
+++ b/API/Objects/Requirement/UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirementTests.cs	Sat Mar 31 15:24:41 2012 +0100
@@ -478,6 +478,90 @@
 			Assert_That__ValidationFails(req, army, "Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType3.Name + " for every 2 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 2 for 5).");
 		}
 
+		[Test]
+		public void TestBug395RequirementShouldNotFindCommonDivisorAdding()
+		{
+			Army army = new Army(mockRace, "Test", 1000);
+			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
+			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(4, 2, unitType2);
+			AddUnitsOfTypeToArmy(3, unitType2, army);
+			Assert_That__FailsAdding(req, unitType1, army, "Army must contain: 4 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every 2 × " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 3 for 1).");
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType2, army);
+			Assert_That__PassesAdding(req, unitType1, army);
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType1, army);
+			Assert_That__PassesAdding(req, unitType1, army);
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType1, army);
+			Assert_That__FailsAdding(req, unitType1, army, "Army must contain: 4 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every 2 × " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 4 for 3).");
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType2, army);
+			Assert_That__FailsAdding(req, unitType1, army, "Army must contain: 4 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every 2 × " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 5 for 3).");
+			AddUnitsOfTypeToArmy(3, unitType2, army);
+			Assert_That__PassesAdding(req, unitType1, army);
+		}
+
+		[Test]
+		public void TestBug395RequirementShouldNotFindCommonDivisorValidating()
+		{
+			Army army = new Army(mockRace, "Test", 1000);
+			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
+			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(4, 2, unitType2);
+			AddUnitsOfTypeToArmy(3, unitType2, army);
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType1, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationFails(req, army, "Army must contain: 4 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every 2 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 3 for 1).");
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType2, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationPasses(req, army);
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType1, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationPasses(req, army);
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType1, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationFails(req, army, "Army must contain: 4 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every 2 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 4 for 3).");
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType2, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationFails(req, army, "Army must contain: 4 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every 2 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 5 for 3).");
+			AddUnitsOfTypeToArmy(3, unitType2, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationPasses(req, army);
+		}
+
+		[Test]
+		public void TestBug395RequirementShouldNotFindCommonDivisorAddingMultiUnits()
+		{
+			Army army = new Army(mockRace, "Test", 1000);
+			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
+			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(4, 2, unitType2, unitType3);
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType3, army);
+			AddUnitsOfTypeToArmy(2, unitType2, army);
+			Assert_That__FailsAdding(req, unitType1, army, "Army must contain: 4 × " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 2 × " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 3 for 1).");
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType2, army);
+			Assert_That__PassesAdding(req, unitType1, army);
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType1, army);
+			Assert_That__PassesAdding(req, unitType1, army);
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType1, army);
+			Assert_That__FailsAdding(req, unitType1, army, "Army must contain: 4 × " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 2 × " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 4 for 3).");
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType2, army);
+			Assert_That__FailsAdding(req, unitType1, army, "Army must contain: 4 × " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 2 × " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 5 for 3).");
+			AddUnitsOfTypeToArmy(3, unitType2, army);
+			Assert_That__PassesAdding(req, unitType1, army);
+		}
+
+		[Test]
+		public void TestBug395RequirementShouldNotFindCommonDivisorValidatingMultiUnits()
+		{
+			Army army = new Army(mockRace, "Test", 1000);
+			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
+			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(4, 2, unitType2, unitType3);
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType3, army);
+			AddUnitsOfTypeToArmy(2, unitType2, army);
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType1, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationFails(req, army, "Army must contain: 4 × " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 2 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 3 for 1).");
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType2, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationPasses(req, army);
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType1, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationPasses(req, army);
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType1, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationFails(req, army, "Army must contain: 4 × " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 2 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 4 for 3).");
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType2, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationFails(req, army, "Army must contain: 4 × " + unitType2.Name + " or " + unitType3.Name + " for every 2 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 5 for 3).");
+			AddUnitsOfTypeToArmy(3, unitType2, army);
+			Assert_That__ValidationPasses(req, army);
+		}
+
 		protected override UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement CreateRequirement(UnitType requirementOn)
 		{
 			return new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(requirementOn);