Mercurial > repos > IBBoard.WarFoundry.API.Tests

changeset 209:fc9a90d29ae0

Find changesets by keywords (author, files, the commit message), revision number or hash, or revset expression.
Re #379: Fix validation of requirements to check for unit * Fix some of the copy-and-paste errors in the tests - some tests still fail
author IBBoard <dev@ibboard.co.uk>
date Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:00:01 +0000
parents c323770e61c2
children 649759343da5
files API/Objects/Requirement/UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirementTests.cs
diffstat 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) [+]
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/API/Objects/Requirement/UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirementTests.cs	Wed Feb 22 20:48:40 2012 +0000
+++ b/API/Objects/Requirement/UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirementTests.cs	Wed Feb 22 21:00:01 2012 +0000
@@ -93,23 +93,24 @@
 		public void TestAddingUnitTriggersFailure()
 		{
 			Army army = new Army(mockRace, "Test", 1000);
-			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType2, army);
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType1, army);
 			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2, 1);
-			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unitType1, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Passed));
+			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unitType1, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
 			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType2, army);
-			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unitType1, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
+			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unitType1, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Passed));
 		}
 
 		[Test()]
-		public void TestAddingUnitTypeDefaultsToNoMoreThanZero()
+		public void TestAddingUnitTypeDefaultsToOne()
 		{
 			Army army = new Army(mockRace, "Test", 1000);
+			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType1, army);
 			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2);
-			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unitType1, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Passed));
+			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unitType1, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
 			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType2, army);
-			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unitType1, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
+			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unitType1, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Passed));
 		}
 
 		[Test]
@@ -141,7 +142,7 @@
 			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType1, army);
 			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2);
-			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unitType2, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Failed));
+			Assert.That(req.AllowsAdding(unitType2, army), Is.EqualTo(Validation.Passed));
 		}
 
 		[Test]
@@ -161,7 +162,7 @@
 			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType2, army);
 			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2);
-			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army cannot contain more than: 0 × " + unitType2.Name + " (have 1)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 0 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every " + unitType1.Name + " (have 1)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test]
@@ -174,7 +175,7 @@
 			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType2, army);
 			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2, 2);
-			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army cannot contain more than: 2 × " + unitType2.Name + " (have 3)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 2 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every " + unitType1.Name + " (have 3)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test]
@@ -186,7 +187,7 @@
 			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType3);
-			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army cannot contain more than: 0 × " + unitType2.Name + " (have 1)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 0 for 1)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test]
@@ -198,7 +199,7 @@
 			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType3);
-			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army cannot contain more than: 0 × " + unitType3.Name + " (have 1)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (have 0 for 1)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test]
@@ -211,7 +212,7 @@
 			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType3);
-			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army cannot contain more than: 0 × " + unitType2.Name + " (have 1); 0 × " + unitType3.Name + " (have 1)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetValidationMessage(army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 0 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every " + unitType1.Name + " (have 1); 0 × " + unitType3.Name + " for every " + unitType1.Name + " (have 1)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test]
@@ -230,7 +231,7 @@
 			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType1, army);
 			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2);
-			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unitType2, army), Is.EqualTo("Army cannot contain more than: 0 × " + unitType2.Name + " (would have 1)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unitType2, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 0 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 1)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test]
@@ -242,7 +243,7 @@
 			AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(unitType2, army);
 			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2, 2);
-			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unitType2, army), Is.EqualTo("Army cannot contain more than: 2 × " + unitType2.Name + " (would have 3)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unitType2, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 2 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 3)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test]
@@ -253,7 +254,7 @@
 			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType3);
-			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unitType2, army), Is.EqualTo("Army cannot contain more than: 0 × " + unitType2.Name + " (would have 1)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unitType2, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 1 × " + unitType3.Name + " for every 1 × " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 0 for 1)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test]
@@ -265,7 +266,7 @@
 			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType3);
-			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unitType3, army), Is.EqualTo("Army cannot contain more than: 0 × " + unitType2.Name + " (would have 1); 0 × " + unitType3.Name + " (would have 1)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unitType3, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 0 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 1); 0 × " + unitType3.Name + " for every " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 1)."));
 		}
 
 		[Test]
@@ -277,7 +278,7 @@
 			UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement req = new UnitRequiresNUnitsForMUnitsRequirement(unitType1);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType2);
 			req.AddUnitTypeRequirement(unitType3);
-			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unitType2, army), Is.EqualTo("Army cannot contain more than: 0 × " + unitType2.Name + " (would have 1); 0 × " + unitType3.Name + " (would have 1)."));
+			Assert.That(req.GetAllowsAddingMessage(unitType2, army), Is.EqualTo("Army must contain: 0 × " + unitType2.Name + " for every " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 1); 0 × " + unitType3.Name + " for every " + unitType1.Name + " (would have 1)."));
 		}
 
 		private static void AddUnitOfTypeToArmy(UnitType unitType, Army army)