Mercurial > repos > IBBoard.WarFoundry.API

comparison API/Objects/Requirement/UnitRequiresNoMoreThanNOfUnitTypeRequirement.cs @ 453:dace3b7779ca

Find changesets by keywords (author, files, the commit message), revision number or hash, or revset expression.
Re #379: Fix validation of requirements to check for unit * Restructure all validation messages to a common base system that will translate better * Update "No More Than" texts to differentiate two contexts (adding and validating)
author IBBoard <dev@ibboard.co.uk>
date Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:05:25 +0000
parents 71fceea2725b
children def5d333c5e8
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
452:b671085871b7 453:dace3b7779ca
15 private UnitType requirementOnType; 15 private UnitType requirementOnType;
16 16
17 public UnitRequiresNoMoreThanNOfUnitTypeRequirement(UnitType requirementOn) : base() 17 public UnitRequiresNoMoreThanNOfUnitTypeRequirement(UnitType requirementOn) : base()
18 { 18 {
19 requirementOnType = requirementOn; 19 requirementOnType = requirementOn;
20 FailureStringPrefix = "Army contains " + requirementOn.Name + " and so cannot contain more than: ";
21 } 20 }
22 21
23 /// <summary> 22 /// <summary>
24 /// Checks whether the supplied WarFoundryObject can be added to the supplied army. 23 /// Checks whether the supplied WarFoundryObject can be added to the supplied army.
25 /// </summary> 24 /// </summary>
35 public override Validation AllowsAdding(WarFoundryObject wfObject, Army toArmy) 34 public override Validation AllowsAdding(WarFoundryObject wfObject, Army toArmy)
36 { 35 {
37 return IsApplicable(wfObject, toArmy) ? base.AllowsAdding(wfObject, toArmy) : Validation.NotApplicable; 36 return IsApplicable(wfObject, toArmy) ? base.AllowsAdding(wfObject, toArmy) : Validation.NotApplicable;
38 } 37 }
39 38
40
41 protected override bool IsApplicable(WarFoundryObject toObject, Army toArmy) 39 protected override bool IsApplicable(WarFoundryObject toObject, Army toArmy)
42 { 40 {
43 return IsApplicable(toArmy) || IsApplicable(toObject); 41 return IsApplicable(toArmy) || IsApplicable(toObject);
44 } 42 }
45
46 43
47 protected override bool IsApplicable(Army toArmy) 44 protected override bool IsApplicable(Army toArmy)
48 { 45 {
49 return toArmy.GetUnitTypeCount(requirementOnType) > 0; 46 return toArmy.GetUnitTypeCount(requirementOnType) > 0;
50 } 47 }
51 48
52
53 protected override bool IsApplicable(WarFoundryObject toObject) 49 protected override bool IsApplicable(WarFoundryObject toObject)
54 { 50 {
55 return requirementOnType.Equals(toObject) || (toObject is Unit && requirementOnType.Equals(((Unit)toObject).UnitType)); 51 return requirementOnType.Equals(toObject) || (toObject is Unit && requirementOnType.Equals(((Unit)toObject).UnitType));
56 } 52 }
53
54 protected override string ValidationFailedMessage
55 {
56 get
57 {
58 return "Army contains " + requirementOnType.Name + " and so cannot contain more than: {0}.";
59 }
60 }
61
62 protected override string AllowsAddingFailedMessage
63 {
64 get
65 {
66 return "Army would contain " + requirementOnType.Name + " and so cannot contain more than: {0}.";
67 }
68 }
57 } 69 }
58 } 70 }
59 71